9/11

When I analyze the events of September 11, 2001, I cannot reconcile the physical collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 with the official explanation provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). In my view, the rapid, symmetrical, and free-fall collapse of a third skyscraper that was not struck by an airplane strongly suggests controlled demolition. When I look at the broader picture, my perspective is that factions within the American security apparatus knowingly allowed or actively facilitated the attacks to manufacture a profound geopolitical pretext. In my opinion, the subsequent launch of the Global War on Terror, the passage of the draconian USA PATRIOT Act, and the subsequent trillion-dollar military engagements in the Middle East served the exact strategic objectives outlined years prior by neoconservative think tanks like the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which explicitly called for a "new Pearl Harbor" to galvanize American military dominance. To me, the official investigations consistently avoided investigating financial irregularities, insider trading prior to the attacks, and known intelligence warnings that were systematically ignored, leaving me to conclude that 9/11 was an inside job of staggering proportions.